Professor backs "intelligent design" in testimony

Notice, what this trial is determining: "decide whether intelligent design can be mentioned in public-school science classes as an alternative to the theory of evolution."
We're not asking to be able to indoctrinate (the way the evolutionists have for years!), simply to provide alternatives to a very leaky theory. I note that some of these same science-worshipers condemn those in history who refused to teach an alternate theory to the notion that the earth is located at the center of the universe. Hmmm... What's good for the goose?